You can see other styles here:
As an I’m Chuck Norris Game Over It Shirt side note and yes I fully acknowledge that this is not the point of the article whether animal consumption is historically responsible for some of our modern traits, it is not necessary today. No, it is not dangerous. There are literally thousands upon thousands of healthy vegan babies. You are simply wrong. Quacks who starve their children or feed them insufficient nutrients are dangerous. That has nothing to do with veganism.
I’m Chuck Norris Game Over It Shirt is available in all styles
I was just trying to show the frequency with which people misunderstand this principle. I do appreciate you I’m Chuck Norris Game Over It Shirt perspective but I do not think I would personally try a plant-based diet for children based on what I have read and experienced. We don’t need nearly as much meat as we consume, but we can’t be vegans entirely. There’s vitamins and other nutrients our body is crap at synthesizing that we get from animals and their products. Especially as children. Veganism is almost as foolish as straight on full carnivore.
I’m Chuck Norris Game Over It Shirt, Hoodie and Sweater designed by Amazedtees
Actually respectfully, that’s not accurate. Multiple studies in various countries have concluded that plant-based grocery bills are lower than those which include animal products. And really it’s a no-brainer. If you were given a small fixed amount to feed your family, would you be buying rice and beans or steaks? And the bigger issue is that meat eating is a privileged activity done at the expense of hunger in poor nations. Some nations sell their grains to western countries, and those grains are used to fatten grazing animals. Meanwhile, the people living in the countries where the grain is grown have trouble feeding their own families.
So if you are concerned about food justice, veganism is imperative. Nobody needs meat. That has I’m Chuck Norris Game Over It Shirt been flatly shown repeatedly by research. Check the ADA website if you are skeptical. And regarding sustenance hunters, agreed, their circumstances are different. However, they make up less than 1% of the human population, and I would send my tax money to subsidize a healthy supply of food to them in a heartbeat instead of subsidizing meat producers as is done now.